Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. Artifact One: Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. King, Martin Luther Jr. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Church Meeting, 1967, Riverside Church, New York City. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audiences pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. How about receiving a customized one? Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. As example, King uses I have a dream that one day and Let freedom ring.. to open his points on how Americans should change against racial indifferences. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. By showing his own emotions, King inspires compassion in the. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. He also focuses on the maltreatment of humanity, and how the Vietnam War is a start to the violence that occurs in America. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. (2016, Nov 14). Since the founding of the Americas in the late 1400s, slavery was a problem; until the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam - 751 Words | Cram The author is using pathos as one of his central rhetorical strategies. With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. The war with Vietnam was just as unjust as unnecessary. He uses the word 'We', connecting with the audience and ensuring them that together they will bring change to social conditions and attitudes. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. This essay was written by a fellow student. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King, Jr., an enormously influential civil rights activist, conveys his indignant and hopeful thoughts regarding the Vietnam War, in his speech "Beyond Vietnam," by utilizing biblical allusion, anaphora, and use of diction. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam By Martin Luther King Don't let the fear of striking out keep you from playing the game. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . In "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," Martin Luther King, a civil rights leader, uses his voice to bring attention to the injustices of race. This paper examines the conditions of the Afro-Americans lives from 1960-today with focus on education, work, income, police brutality and criminality. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. requirements? What Is the Macro Environment in Business Analysis? Public Speech. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. It also reminds people of inequality through images of everyday life in the United States. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. Favorite Quote:Life is like a box of cheese and flower petal sometimes it's soft and sweet, sometimes it just plain stinks. Dont He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. down the pipe, "I watched this program broken and eviscerated" through the "buildup in Vietnam,". By continuing well Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. However, his words while they aim to bring the pain of the Vietnamese alive before the audience also include a request that a progressive nation should stand with humanity and not lose control of its feelings. Dr. King includes a brief, but poignant history of the war in Vietnam which is important because he needs to prove that he knows and understands the politics of the situation. This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr. in his speech, "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, discusses the Vietnam war. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. By claiming that the United States, the greatest purveyor of violence, prefers, massive doses of violence to solve its problems, King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. (21). Registered address: Louki Akrita, 23 Bellapais Court, Flat/Office 46 1100, Nicosia, Cyprus The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the. This is a logical fact with which no one can argue. Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence speech delivered on April 4, 1967, revolved around the growing concern with America's involvement in the Vietnam war. King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. He uses metaphorical imagery, powerful diction,and symbolism to create an impact on the audience. writing your own paper, but remember to He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech | ipl.org Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. "beyond Vietnam-A Time To Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis King proved this partly with the quote, America would never invest the necessary funds in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued (King, Beyond, 9). However, he is about to arm them with many valid reasons why it is crucial for them to join the opposition. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" You may use it as a guide or sample for His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence Analysis | ipl.org Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Thank you! https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam - 419 Words | Cram All they wanted was to save the soul of America (King, Beyond, 42). The paper concludes that Kings dream have not come true, but, Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam. Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. (2022, May 4). At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. It is not typical for churches to do so. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. King uses emotional words and descriptions to capture the audiences attention and convey the injustices caused by the Vietnam War. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war(8). Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" - Teen Ink Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. He shows a strong theme of determination, along with dedication, and perseverance. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis . Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. Many great speeches are increasingly different. https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. It is why he constructs an argument that will help people decide which side to stand with and which to not. Some would be uninterested and some not knowing what to do. However, all wanted clarity on the subject. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam - StudyMode Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. If he had not shown knowledge of the background of the war, it would be easy to dismiss his other pleas as lofty religious ideals. Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. Kings dialect showed the audience civil right issues, involving many rhetorical strategies using ethos, logos, and pathos, to a racially tempered crowd whom he viewed as different, but not equal. This comparison is very sobering. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Thomas 1 Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam He strengthens his argument through his use of rhetorical questions and an anecdote. His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. In a similar light, King addressed the speech I have a dream to a peaceful mass gathering in Washington asking for change.